Prepare a link-based (no-code) RFP for a quick pilot; also compare SDK/API options for long-term integration.
Use a downloadable RFP package (template, KPIs, timeline, scoring rubric) to expedite procurement and vendor evaluation.
Focus KPIs on try-on rate, conversion lift, add-to-cart lift, and return-rate delta; measure these with GA4.
One example vendor (tryitonme.com) offers SDK-free deployment, unique product link delivery, and asset processing within 3 business days.
Introduction — Why every optical frames retailer needs an RFP for virtual try-on
The optical frames virtual try on RFP in this post includes a downloadable, ready-to-send RFP pack (templates, KPIs, timeline) so your procurement or e‑commerce team can move from shortlist to pilot without guesswork.
Short version for busy teams: issuing an RFP helps you control scope, compare like‑for‑like commercial terms (pricing, SLAs), and set measurable success criteria (conversion lift, returns, page engagement). Use the downloadable RFP pack linked below to accelerate procurement and ensure vendor responses map to your KPIs and timelines: Downloadable RFP pack.
What it is: vendor delivers a shareable URL (or embed snippet) that opens the try-on experience in a browser or in-app webview—no SDK or code changes required.
Pros: fastest time-to-market, zero or minimal engineering lift, easy sharing across channels (email, SMS, social), simple pilot and rollback.
Cons: slightly less native integration control; verify analytics and commerce handover options.
Copyable comparison you can paste into your RFP:
"Please provide details and pricing for both:
a) SDK/API integration (include estimated dev hours per platform and sample integration tasks), and
b) Link-based, zero-code deployment (include sample product link behaviors, sharing options, and expected time-to-market)."
Reference for web-based AR standards and browser capabilities: WebXR overview.
Why tryitonme.com is the Right Fit for Your Business
If your procurement objective is rapid, low-risk adoption for optical frames, tryitonme.com is built to match those needs:
Zero-code, link-based deployment: unique try-on product link delivered—no SDK required.
Fast onboarding and delivery: 6‑month package purchase; you provide standard photos (e.g., front/side for frames); our team/AI handles all AR processing; you receive the unique try-on link in under 3 business days.
Multi-channel shareability: product links work across web, mobile, social, email, and in-store kiosks.
Accurate accessory VTO that prioritizes optical frames use cases, merchandising, and analytics.
Downloadable virtual try on rfp template — section-by-section walkthrough
Below is a short walkthrough of each RFP section with copy-paste snippets your team can use.
1. Executive summary
"Our organization seeks proposals for an optical frames virtual try-on solution. Purpose: reduce online uncertainty, improve conversion for eyewear SKUs, and enable fast, cross-channel deployment using a link-based (no-code) option."
2. Objectives
Bullet sample:
Improve conversion for try-on-enabled frames.
Reduce returns attributable to fit/appearance uncertainty.
Deploy a pilot in 12 weeks; scale to full catalog thereafter.
3. Scope of work
"Vendor will produce AR-ready assets for [X] SKUs, provide unique try-on links for each product, and support a pilot phase. Includes asset production (based on client-submitted photos), QA, and analytics integration."
4. Deliverables
List sample deliverables: Assets per SKU, product try-on links, analytics dashboard access, training docs, support SLA.
5. Timeline
Include your sample timeline (see Timeline & milestones section) and require vendor to detail milestones.
6. KPIs
Include primary/secondary KPIs (see KPI section below) and reporting cadence.
7. Pricing
Request pricing breakdown: per-SKU setup, monthly platform fee, per-try-on or usage fees, pilot pricing.
8. Legal/compliance
Require DPA, IP ownership clarity, NDAs, and data retention policy.
9. Evaluation criteria
Specify weights and scoring rubric (see vendor scoring section).
Template asset: Sample SOW and acceptance criteria
SOW structure (copyable outline):
- Project overview
- Deliverables (list)
- Milestones and dates
- Responsibilities (vendor vs client)
- Acceptance tests and criteria
- Support & escalation
- Try-on link loads within [X] seconds on target devices.
- Try-on matches product orientation for three standard face poses. https://cermin.id/pupillary-distance-try-on-guide
- Analytics events fire to GA4 for try-on start, try-on complete, add-to-cart.
- Uptime of try-on links >= 99% during pilot.
- All delivered SKU assets match naming and metadata standards.
Try on proposal template explained — what to ask vendors and how to score responses
Ask vendors to fill these fields in their proposal:
Technical approach and architecture (link-based vs SDK).
Detailed timeline and milestone commitments.
Pricing breakdown and optional costs.
Sample work or demo links for optical frames.
Support model and SLA.
Security, data processing, and compliance details.
Client references and case studies.
Suggested scoring weights (example):
Technical fit & product accuracy: 30%
Time-to-market & deployment model: 20%
Cost & pricing flexibility: 25%
UX / merchant feature set and analytics: 15%
References & reliability: 10%
Use the vendor-facing template included in the download to request these fields in a consistent format.
Metadata: SKU, frame width (mm), lens type, color, category tag. See practical guidance on frame fit, PD/IPD and fit checks for frames: frame fit guide.
Device & browser support (sample RFP language)
“Vendor must support the latest two versions of major desktop and mobile browsers, plus WebView in common mobile apps. Provide a compatibility matrix.”
Performance SLAs (sample)
Link time-to-interactive: <= 3s on 4G mobile (vendor to provide objective lab test method).
Uptime: >= 99% during pilot.
Support response: initial response within 4 business hours, critical SLA 24/7 escalation.
For guidance on optimizing mobile performance and reducing load/CPU for eyewear try-ons, see: mobile performance guide.
Embedding and sharing
Include language requesting details on how links can be embedded in product pages, popups, email campaigns, and social posts without custom SDKs. For platform-specific embedding examples (Shopify PDP try-on button and embed patterns), see: Shopify embed guide.
Legal, compliance & accessibility considerations (GDPR, data retention, WCAG)
Contract clauses to request in RFP:
Data Processing Agreement (DPA) and standard contractual clauses as applicable — GDPR guidance: gdpr.eu.
IP ownership: clarify who owns processed AR assets and whether vendor may reuse anonymized derivatives.
NDA: for confidential product roadmaps and pricing.
Data retention policy: minimum and maximum retention windows; deletion on contract end.
Recommendation: include placeholders in template legal sections for your legal team to review and finalize.
Example RFP language — requesting link-based, no-code virtual try-on
"Primary requirement: Vendor must provide a zero-code, link-based virtual try-on option that requires no SDK or development effort from the client for initial deployment. Provide examples of link behavior, sharing options, and sample links for at least three optical frames. Vendors may also provide SDK/API options, but proposals that enable rapid, no-code pilot deployment will be scored higher due to reduced engineering lift and faster time-to-value."
"We prioritize link-based deployments to allow rapid piloting across web, mobile, and social channels with minimal engineering resources. While SDKs are useful for long-term integration, a no-code option reduces rollout time and risk for the initial catalog."
Sample evaluation example — how tryitonme.com meets rapid deployment & zero-code needs
Model vendor response you can expect from tryitonme.com:
Asset inputs: client provides standard photos (front + side for frames).
AR processing: tryitonme.com team/AI handles all AR model creation.
Delivery: unique, ready-to-use try-on link per product delivered in under 3 business days.
Use this example in your scoring rubric as a baseline for “time-to-delivery” and “engineering lift” evaluation.
Formats, distribution & gating recommendations for the downloadables
Recommended file formats to publish:
Word (.docx) and Google Docs (editable)
PDF (read-only)
Excel/Google Sheets for scoring rubric and KPI dashboard
Demo GIF or short MP4 walkthrough
Gating options (recommended):
Email capture for initial download (good for lead capture)
Direct download for procurement partners (low friction)
Internal distribution checklist:
Share with Procurement, Product, Creative, IT, Legal stakeholders
Schedule vendor Q&A session and demo windows
FAQs — common procurement questions
Q: How long to implement for a 1,000‑SKU pilot?
A: Use the sample timeline above; asset processing and pilot integration typically fit into a 12–15 week schedule from award to pilot launch (see Timeline & milestones).
Q: Can we get a demo before RFP closes?
A: Yes. Request a live demo or shareable link-based demo; vendors should include demo links in proposals.
Q: What pricing models exist?
A: Common models include subscription (platform fee), per-SKU setup, per-try-on usage fees, or hybrid models. Use the vendor proposal template to request detailed pricing breakdowns.
Q: How is privacy handled?
A: Request the vendor’s DPA, data retention policy, and compliance statements (see GDPR guidance linked in the legal section).
Q: What device/browser coverage should we expect?
A: Require support for the latest two major versions of desktop and mobile browsers and WebView in common mobile apps; request a compatibility matrix and lab test methods for latency.
Next steps & CTA — download the RFP pack and book a demo/pilot
Content editor checklist (meta & ALT text guidance)
Primary meta description (suggested): “Download a ready-to-send optical frames virtual try on RFP pack: templates, KPIs, scoring rubric, timeline, and sample SOW to pilot link-based, no-code VTO.”
ALT text guidance for images:
Hero image: “Virtual try-on for optical frames — shopper testing frames via link-based AR”